In the light of recent development is it safe to assume that JetBrain products are not use for Russian espionage?
[1]https://www.jetbrains.com/careers/jobs/
[2]https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/06/us/politics/russia-cyber-hack.html
They made a statement. Not sure it removes all risk from their software, but I’m using it right now.
We should be discouraging alarmism, especially given the political situation.
Suddenly, because US/EU sh#t foreign policy that led to this Russia /Ukraine war, Jetbrains became a problem?
What kind of brain washing is this?
> In the light of recent development is it safe to assume that JetBrain products are not use for Russian espionage?
If you don't trust the software you are using, just don't use closed source software, use only free, open and libre software or compile it yourself. Since all closed source software is essentially 'malware'.
That is safe to assume.
This post, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30459985#30461340, praising JetBrains, is not flagged. Also, interesting.
Kasppersky is (was?) the world's most widely deployed anti virus. It was founded by a former KGB officer and is closely tied to the Russian government.
It was found to be uploading files to Russia when their algo figured it was good docs for the Russians to have.
JB is probably in the same boat. (So is Zoom and lots of other software, but that's for another day)
If you are writing software for the Ukrainian army, don't use JetBrains. If you are a small time dev in the U.S. it is likely within your risk profile.
If you just want to punish Putin, and therefore you would stop using Russian software, that's another story, and one that I have a harder time justifying.
A citizen of country X should never assume that intelligence agencies of country Y are not spying on them or their communications through any and all available means.
The statement applies even when Y = X.