To my surprise the question was flagged and there appeared a "past" link beneath the question. This link lead me to what I would consider a vulgar commentary full of prolific language.
my question is how exactly is a question supposed to be phrased to avoid being "Flagged" and subsequently censored by what I can only imagine is an individual with an agenda contrary to the subject of my inquiry?
In other words, don't take it personally.
The “past” link is dumb and automated. It just links to a title search. Usually used to find duplicate stories. For example if somebody submits a story about a breaking-news topic that has been submitted 10 times from other sources in short amount of time. It’s not meant to link to a specific story, what you saw is likely a random result.
And I say that, as somebody who is very likely to be contributing to the mess because I am unsure I can restrain myself from polemic. Dislike of these individuals shouldn't colour honest debate, but I struggle with this. I don't believe in some (false) moral euivalency here, and I know that has direct impact on the quality of discourse.
I just searched for "Ask HN: Opinions on Jordan Peterson?" on Hacker News - Hacker News Search https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Ask%20HN%3A%20Opinions%20on%20...