The fact that Apple released 3 phones in 3 years with this form factor shows me that it is a profitable market segment and that there is demand.
Why is there no Android equivalent?
https://m.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&nHeightMax...
https://www.productchart.com/smartphones/small_android_phone...
You can move the "RAM" slider to 3GB which will show the phones that have 3GB or more. And the screen slider to your desired size. A height of 140mm means the phone would have a display size of roughly 5 or 6 inches.
For the USA, it gives me 90 phones with 3GB and up to 6 inches.
In my opinion, a phone should be small enough that it can fit in the palm of one hand, with every part of the screen reachable with the thumb of that hand. Unfortunately, screen sizes have been creeping up with each generation, and it's impossible to find reasonably sized phones anymore.
Couple that with a niche audience and the cost of ordering a batch of different sized screens (in smaller quantities), it's just not that attractive a market to get into.
In short, they would be trying to sell a device with smaller profits that they KNOW will get panned by reviewers to a niche audience.
These all sound plausible, except for one thing: Why does Apple sell the SE (which is rumoured to be due for a refresh in March), the iPhone 12 mini, and now the iPhone 13 mini? Are Apple unaware of all the reasons why they can't make money selling a compact phone?
Apple have literally no reason to sell these phones except to make money. It's not like the market is flooded with compact Android phones and they have to sell a compact phone or lose out. With a dearth of good competitive options, Apple could decline to sell a compact phone and still make out like bandits.
I conclude that there is a market for selling compact phones, and Apple is doing just fine in it. If there's a systemic reason compact phones won't sell on Android, there must be an android-specific factor in play, because clearly there is a demand for these phones and a willingness to pay a premium to buy one from Apple.
I switched to Pixel 5 recently. I am happy with it, the main reason I wanted/liked the smaller phones so I could reach everything with my thumb and I could use the phone with one hand.
The advantage of Pixel 5 (and other newer phones) is that they are very thin, so it is easier to hold in one hand. The other thing that just got introduced with Android 12 is the one-handed mode, that I use a lot. With these two things in mind I have to say, I don't mind the size of the phone.
[0] https://geizhals.eu/?cat=umtsover&xf=10063_11.0%7E157_131072...
I think the big issue with small Android phones is battery life. Apple was already getting some flak for it, and between the SoC and OS, it's a much more power efficient system.
https://www.samsung.com/global/galaxy/galaxy-s10/specs/
And LineageOS is offically supported https://wiki.lineageos.org/devices/beyond0lte/
The Jelly 2: https://www.unihertz.com/products/jelly-2
Dimensions: 95*49.4*16.5mm
Weight: 110g (with battery)
CPU: Helio P60 Octa-Core, 2.0GHz
Operating System: Android 10
Memory: 6GB+128GB UFS 2.1
You see the same phenomenon in the laptop market. Device size is designed around screen size, and you can only get certain sizes like 13.3", 15.6". Apple is one of the few companies that controls their own screen manufacturing.
If you're looking for a small but flagship Android then there's currently only the Asus ZenFone (expensive) or the Galaxy phones (s21, a52) which are reasonable in size. But at least the Samsung are full of bloatware.
I think the main reason not more are being built because it's hard to fit in a decent battery and the latest hardware needs more power so phones get bigger.
Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - 1080x540 IPS, 3GB, 120GB flash, dual sim, 119mm x 58mm x 12mm, 123g, Mediatek MT6761, 3000 mAh, USB-C, Android 10, 100€
Android needs a way for OEMs to get some worthwhile profit in more than one market segment, and loading their own proprietary OSes isn't it.
It's honestly been 7 years since a had a smartphone I was excited about.
Unihertz makes even smaller phones: https://www.unihertz.com/en-de/collections/all-products
There are also some other small-time companies, but the major players are stuck in bigger-is-better mode, unfortunately :/
It does a lot of things right: is a (relatively) smol phone, has proper software updates/support, has a headphone jack, allows for bootloader unlocking, support eSIM, has usb3, has a large development community for custom roms/after-market support, and has proper noise cancellation for calls (many other OEMs don't have proper noise cancellation leading to echos all the time)
The other contenders are all either larger (but better hardware value), had worse software support, or had a combination of the previous.
I will however give a nod to OnePlus for allowing QFIL flashing and having those files available for when devices are soft-bricked/stuck in EDL mode so you can always rescue them. However, their software leaves a lot to be desired in both long term software updates (older models are often not given timely updates), and in refinement (ex. my OnePlus 6T constantly echos on phone calls).
A note if you're going to go Pixel line: if you ever decide to root, MAKE SURE you flash the correct model's files. I've seen several times online and had a friend flash the wrong model and end up perma-bricking their phones. Google does /not/ release the QFIL/firehose files for their phones (unlike OnePlus, Xiaomi) so if you make this mistake you WILL have to send it back for a motherboard replacement. If you don't have warranty coverage, that phone is permanently bricked. Make sure you flash the right files.
Jelly 2 is small and quite usable for its tiny nature.
So I bought a 6" tall Pixel 5 elsewhere, not quite as small as you're looking for, but a great phone, and it feels tiny compared to the S9+.
[1] https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Free-Shipping-2-5-Inc...
- Screens use energy as the square of their diagonal dimension.
- Batteries store energy as the square of their diagonal dimension.
So it's a wash? No! Since there are other things inside the phone whose dimensions are essentially fixed (the phone itself), the proportion of battery area to the screen area tends to one as the phone gets larger. My 2016 iPhone SE (daily driver) has a battery about a third the size of the phone. I can imagine that an iPhone 13 Pro has a battery at least 2/3s the total size.
So you have to choose two of three: Battery life, fast phone (uses more power), or small phone.
I chose: none of the above. My next phone will be a Pinephone no matter what it's dimensions, battery life or performance is. We have to break the power of Big Tech.
(I'm still happy with my xperia 10 III. Tall phone, but only 68mm width)
Correlation does not imply causation. Apple might also be releasing them to use their old manufactured parts, Apple has a very healthy recycle plan for users who trade in their phones, not all Android OEMs have that. And Apple likes to boast about how environmentally friendly they are. 2 of 3 phones you mentioned are using some older parts.
So the releasing could purely be reuse some old parts thus reducing the manufacturing costs, and gain a little higher profit on these despite having low sale numbers from these.
https://www.unihertz.com/collections/all-products
They just aren't popular because they have a lot of tradeoffs.
I think I'm gonna stick with my Xperia XZ2 Compact until it literally breaks apart. It's been quite good last 3 years.
I couldn't find any Android phone under 140mm since then.
Small phone ? Iphone SE 2020: 4.7" screen. Niiiice ! Large Phone ? Asus Zenphone 8, 5.9" screen. Too huuuuge :-(
except... with bezels, Iphone's body is 5.45" (138.4mm), Zenfone is 5.83" (148mm). a very small difference in height (less than 0.5"/1cm), for a screen that's... 38% bigger.
However, depending on your interests I feel like there are some decent products on the market:
- Galaxy Z Flip3; it’s actually quite nice. I don’t think the technology is quite there yet, so you’d be an early adapter. Depending on how much you want a small phone, might be worth it. - Galaxy S22 (It’s 146mm, so a bit over) - Alcatel 1 (2021), very budget but compact (138mm)
Then there are phones from some brands I barely know: Doro, Emporia come to mind. iirc CrossCall also has a compact phone. And other brands mentioned in this thread.
Lastly, there’s a niche market of old style phones with whatsapp/browser support. No nice keyboards on those though, check the Nokia 6300 if you want to see what I’m on about.
If you want decent screen and specs though, the S22 is the best bet.
I use a iphone 12 mini because of the lack of android alternative and I'm sad to see my last resort go :(
https://www.amazon.com/Sudroid-Unlocked-Smartphone-Smallest-...
https://www.gsmarena.com/oppo_find_n-11267.php
Dimensions: Unfolded: 132.6 x 140.2 x 8.0 mm Folded: 132.6 x 73 x 15.9 mm
Internal: 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
A bit on the expensive side though...
I don't think this is necessarily a good conclusion. Typically planning and design of a phone happens at least 2 years in advance. This means that they may have been lining up manufacturing contracts for the iPhone 13 mini before they had decisive evidence on the profitability of the iPhone SE. Also note that the profitability of the SE may well have been based on price more than size.
I think if they release another one then it is likely that they do find it profitable and one next year would be pretty strong evidence.
I suspect the answer is this: a market restricted by NDAs and closed source software that stifles innovation, and a marketing department that caters towards the YouTube front page / influencers. (Or at least, their perception of that.)
But I suspect in another way, things that made Android awesome initially, like replaceable batteries, became an undesired feature as battery technology progressed. My screen will break, or I'll want a new phone before the battery gives out.
I keep the 4 going for certain things and every time I pick it up it's a joy because it's so compact.
No risk of dropping it, unlike the new one which I've stuck tennis racquet grip on the case to help! (it doesn't look as stupid as it sounds!)
Balmuda Phone is tiny, and meets your criteria, but I think it's Japan only.
Apple may have had a product in that form factor, but is that segment stagnant? Do they have it sewn up? Can a profit be turned by competing there?
If there is better margin with an S22 large enough to land a drone, then that direction is where efforts will tend.
Android ecosystem has models cheap enough for quarter of minis price, and it still would be a decent phone with decent screen and other specs.
placed an order during the fire sale season of HP TouchPad but order got cancelled
that was a cute one (WebOS)
Because big brands are marketing driven. Most of marketing people are followers. They see Samsung Note being a blockbuster, and all copy.
Very few marketing people can play their own line, because they don't know how.
If look who puts innovation into the space, you see most successful new things, and especially lifestyle products being introduced by outsiders:
Samsung Note — an enthusiast product launched for SK domestic market largely on engineering's own initiative,
Asus EEE — Asus's business higher-ups were very sceptical, but were overruled by Chairman Shih,
Apple Iphone - no comments needed