- You have have gained some insights about a specific domain, to solve some challenges in this domain
- You want to setup an organisation to solve this problem
- The insights are completely paradigm shifting. When you talk to others about the problem, and solutions. You can see they are not getting to the root causes. They are just scratching at the surface.
- The vision of what this organisation could be, and the change it could initiate drives fear in you
- You are afraid of telling people what the idea & plan (how to) because you think they will call you crazy!
* As an example :
We have a hypothetical world, tataoine. On tatoine there are tribes, and all tribes resolve conflict between each other by fighting. They never do anything else.
So an entire industry has popped up in order to build swords - 95% of people are building swords in the same way for generations.
- Some forward thinking folks have come about and said your methods of building swords are not optimal. So they have optimised the method of building
- Some other folks have come about and said maybe we need new types of swords, so now they are building light sabres
NOW:
- This insight began with some first principals thinking. What should this thing actually be, no other assumptions. How can we actually solve for the right problem (resolving conflict)
- The realisation is that sword makers are producing swords for a world that no longer requires swords, but everyone still continues because they think its best
- Because there is so much swords produced, organisations spring up to architect "conflict" so that they can leverage the swords
- This is what keeps the system going- Along comes someone and says, hey instead of first resorting to war. Maybe we should just speak to each other first.
- Completely different paradigm on how to resolve conflict)
Insight was gained due to my own struggle with trying to solve a challenge in my own personal life, and not finding any satisfactory solutions.
* This is just an example, the insight has nothing to do with ACTUAL war. Just wanted to throw in the light sabre reference :)
When you say you have gained some insights about a domain, it sounds also like you might be a crank, for example if I gained some insights regarding topology and stochastic processes and was going to devote time to working on it, I would actually be a crank and end up sending my important mathematical proofs around to people who would be hard put to respond charitably to my ravings. Not saying that's you, but lots of otherwise sensible people gain insights into something outside their normal realm of expertise and then go on mad errands to save the world, generally very intelligent people, not realizing that these domains require more than just intelligence to gain an insight into them but also many years of study.
Finally when someone says they have a paradigm changing thing but cannot divulge it, some people may feel the person is either pretentious and does not realize they do not have paradigm changing thing, or that the person is unhinged (because talking about paradigm changing things before the paradigm has been changed will naturally sound unhinged to some people)
All of which says if you believe strongly you can change the paradigm you will have to do something to show it to people, and even the people you show it to (in my experience) will probably be too limited to see then possibilities in what you propose. The proof is in the pudding, and the weirder the pudding the more you will have to work to get people to eat it and realize how delicious it actually is.
Also when someone says their idea sparks fear in them because of the implications this is also a weird thing, because it implies what - a possible result of your idea is dystopia, mass extinction...? This contributes to the whole feeling like maybe you are overthinking the situation.
Chances are you'll fare best by hiding your earth-shattering new paradigm behind a veneer of familiarity. Then nobody has to know you have deep insights no one else has.
(As an example; the actual reason for wars is not ideological, or "hate", or failure to communicate, or anything such. It's just "fighting for resources".)
You seem like an idealist. So let me say two things:
1. don’t reject startup advice or business advice. Whatever your noble vision of the world, it will need a delivery and distribution mechanism to spread it. That will look like business and marketing. If you’re averse to it because it is “impure” you will only hinder your efforts.
2. It doesn’t matter if the world is not as it “should be”. Let’s say people are building swords because they just like fighting and feeling manly. It doesn’t matter that there is a theoretically better way to resolve conflict. Accept the world as it is and be humbled. It is you who was wrong, not every other person in the world.
2) Try not to care about other people calling you crazy. If you can't then talk to people anonymously
Is this about a technology change or a political change?
To keep peace you need bigger stick than the others..
Looking for people who have experienced similar self-doubt, and how you moved pass this.