If yes: do you work on reducing it, and how do you prioritise what to do (i.e. what has impact)? Are you willing to change your lifestyle or are you relying mostly on tech? (Solar, EVs, or other things)
If no: who should be responsible for reducing carbon emissions? (If anyone)
Solar will not work great on my property but I will eventually install some. I've been holding off from Solar not just because of my property but also because low frequency inverters are still evolving and competition is growing. I am leaning towards Hysolis.
I am holding off with EV trucks as options are very limited, many bugs are still being worked out and competition is still very weak. My first EV will most probably be a side-by-side [1] and that should be fine for ~95% of my driving needs. I would prefer a Honda EV side-by-side if they made one.
> The use of household carbon footprint calculators originated when oil producer BP hired Ogilvy to create an "effective propaganda" campaign to shift responsibility of climate change-causing pollution away from the corporations and institutions that created a society where carbon emissions are unavoidable and onto personal lifestyle choices.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_footprint
Kurzgesagt also provided a very good view on this that I agree with - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiw6_JakZFc - "Can YOU Fix Climate Change?" (No*). The video explains it much better than I could in a comment but if you're concerned about your own contribution, you're focusing on the wrong thing.
In general, I just try to avoid waste and over-consumption. I think that an obsessive focus on carbon is missing the rest of the system and the rest of our impacts. I think the primary driver for most of our negative impacts is consumption and population growth, specifically excessive and irresponsible consumption. That covers carbon emissions (agriculture is a huge producer), over-fishing, over-abundance of disposable products that done recycle, littering, etc.
The solar panels you mention are a great example, they seem to address carbon footprint, but there's still substantial output during the manufacturing process and they'll just end up in a landfill a couple decades later. So sure, better on the carbon front, but technically non-renewable (hardware).
Innovation and technology is how we solved our problems in the past, there’s no reason to think this time it will be different.
I use an app to pay a small amount each month to offset emissions.
I'm vegetarian, partly due to climate issues.
I'd like solar panels, but they are expensive and won't offset my whole electricity usage.
I'd like an electric car, but currently drive a petrol car, but will change when I can.
I very rarely fly, and only once every 10 years fly long haul, though generally due to budget rather than emission based constraints!
I'd like to cut more, but it's tough to see how to make cost effective cuts.
Thanks to Kurzgesagt. They did a great video essay at :
"Who Is Responsible For Climate Change? – Who Needs To Fix It?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipVxxxqwBQw
Also Goodheart's law:
Perhaps it's too optimistic but my focus is more on options like solar and fission in the medium term, fusion and carbon capture in the long term.