the current end result on the "promise" of reimplimenting a suggested, but not defined/implimented, "MUCH saner/simpler way"?
Unrealistic even if the requirements of the following quote can be met in a way that would mute all resistence to change.
from google search of "extra ordinary claims require extra ordinary proof"
“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” was a phrase
made popular by Carl Sagan who reworded Laplace's principle, which
says that “the weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must
be proportioned to its strangeness” (Gillispie et al., 1999).
see also : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagan_standardLot of things are phased out only because noone has knowledge / more expensive to up keep than upgrade /
broke & no replacement for old original stuff available.
examples: y2k / cobol / cell phone wireless protocols
Even ignoring $$/re-eduation time/replacement down time to convert over; lot easier/less fustrating/more
realistic to attempt to win lotto more than once and become a hermit.