There have been rising standards of living around the world so that many people can afford a smart phone that connects to the internet. Many of these people are unsophisticated internet users. Add to that large number the large number of younger teens in the Western world who can now have smart phones and always on internet access. This is a huge number of people who are susceptible to clever marketing about web3 being the next version of the web, so they better get in on it.
Why should I care if the teenage son of a wealthy banker in Switzerland wants to blow his Dad's money speculating on NFT's? How about the sons and daughter of wealthy Arabs in the oil countries? Surely it doesn't matter if I, as a member of the Silicon Valley elite, take them for a ride and teach them a valuable lesson while profiting handsomely?
I'm searching for my moral compass, but I'm kind of losing my interest in finding it as I think about all the money to be made from the great numbers of wealthy kids who won't be made homeless by the tricks of Silcon Valley. I'd be doing my part to balance out wealth inequality, so I'd actually be performing a useful service for society.
You're deliberately constructing the least empathetic victim to allow yourself to pretend this is victimless. The people you'd be scamming would be people like you. People with hopes and dreams. People confused about what the future holds and who have a lot of anxiety about it. The bit about balancing out wealth inequality is totally ludicrous. You can't beat the casino from inside the house. And if you're embarking on your life of amoral grift, why would you care about social justice? It seems like you're trying to have it both ways, morality doesn't matter, just grift, and the grift is good actually.
It looks to me like you're rationalizing something you know is dumb, and that's why you're asking us to talk you out of it. I don't know why you're doing that, but maybe that is a better question to ask yourself? I've had similar moments in life where I didn't know how to proceed, and I was just so desperate to do _something_, change _something_, that I tried to talk myself into taking a path I knew was the wrong choice.
As a practical matter, you're probably too late to be a robber baron in the NFT craze. You're having this epiphany because you're starting to hear the music, but by the time you've heard it, it's already slowing down. You may as well say, Ask HN, why shouldn't I give Bernie Madoff money and collect that sweet 10%/year? People will continue to mint money from NFTs, maybe for months, maybe for years, but they'll be people like Beeple and a16z, people who got in early and have sufficient inertia to keep moving, even as the sails go slack.
It may be instructive that the people who got in with Madoff early - had to give the money back. When you play dumb games the result is almost always that you win dumb prizes.
Hey, I hope things work out for you. You don't have to make a big decision tonight. You don't have to make a decision this week. Chew on it. Seek alternatives. I think it's great you made this post. Keep looking for evidence that you're wrong. Confirmation bias is subtle and we all struggle with it.
Just remember, when you're playing with this kind of a crowd, this late in the game -- it's all about being the last person holding the bag.
Do you know that the phrase means? And do you want to be that person?
I've been pretty skeptical until I had a recent epiphany brought on by a16z's enthusiasm for the market.
Which is utterly and transparently deranged, BTW. Either that, or very cynically and skillfully devised to promote businesses with the specific intent of fleecing down brave, optimistic people very much like yourself.
I'm not exaggerating here; just look a the opening paragraph of one of their recent pronouncements on this subject:
https://future.a16z.com/the-future-of-work-daos-crypto-netwo...
So I don't care to try to convince you of anything, but I would suggest that there are thousands of people thinking the way you are, and it's still possible to lose all your money due to a shock -- even if you think you're the shark and other people are the fish.
> as I think about all the money to be made from the great numbers of wealthy kids who won't be made homeless by the tricks of Silcon Valley
I was wondering if this were true, and (as far as I can tell) it's not far off[1].
1. https://cheddar.com/media/crypto-investor-white-male-survey-...
The primary reason is because if you are not "in the know" so to speak, it won't be you who will take advantage of others, it will be you who will be taken advantage of. You think (and I mean you as in not just you personally but more broadly) you're the first one to think of minting NFTs by hiring artists on Upwork? No, that has been known since NFTs became popular. It takes quite a bit of money to mint, and the vast majority of creators won't ever see positive ROI. You think you're the only one who wants to cash in on coins to get rich quick? Well, that's what everyone wants to do, until the rug gets pulled.
People in crypto are not as stupid and gullible as you think. They are just as smart and have likely been pulling scams since before the crypto days. Take care not to fall victim to them yourself all the while thinking you'll be the one outscamming them.
> I'd be doing my part to balance out wealth inequality
> I'd actually be performing a useful service for society
Surely this is sarcasm or something else? How would transferring wealth from one part of the 1% to another part of the 1% benefit anyone else than the "Silicon Valley elite" you so proudly proclaim to belong to?
If you actually wanna re-balance the wealth of the world, you should steal from the rich and give to the poor, not steal from the rich and give to the other rich.
Not unless you are giving what you take to the poor, Robin Hood.
It’s not at all clear to me that we know who they all are.
Accordingly I’m not sure you can be sure of any given scenario anyway.
Beyond that I wonder why you think you can “take advantage “? Assuming you can would seem to make you the perfect mark…
Kid lists it, Daddy buys it from his anonymous crypto wallet. Tada, gift tax avoided and daddys liabilities reduced.
So yeah, go try it. "Don't spend more than you are willing to lose".
There's a reason there's a whole lot of money sloshing around in the space. It's because regular people keep thinking they can get in on the action.
When it fails, you'll be happy to have less eggs in their basket.
> I, as a member of the Silicon Valley elite.
Not everyone even here on HN is a member of the "Silicon Valley elite". Would that make it jusified for someone outside of SV to fleece money from people in SV because "They have their cushy FAANG jobs to fall back on"? I hope your answer is no.
Think of it like this. Everyone everywhere are somewhere on a ladder, you, me, those rich kids spending daddies money, the homeless guy living in a doorway, everyone. You are looking up that ladder thinking "Dam, I want some of what that they have..." which everyone on the ladder does. But remember if your thoughts are about fleecing or scamming your way up a few runs of the ladder there will always be people below you on that ladder, looking up and now looking at you as a target.
ISSUE NUMBER THE SECOND:
Basically, you are never going to be able to scam just the wealthly people who "can afford to lose it". There will always be some "friendly fire", casualties of war so to speak.
The people floating around your target are in one way or another influenced by said targets wealth, populatity, charisma, whatever. They wil see the "shiney thing" influencer purchased and might well think "I want one of those, Rick Kid Jimmy is ure they will go up in value" and scrimp together money they really should be spending on something else and by into what Rich Kid Jimmy is into or atleast want to. Sure no everyone will be able to buy it at "day one" of your master plan even with raiding their life savings but OHHHH SHINEY THING that will increase in value!
But lets say no one floating around Rick Kid Jimmy buys in and you successfully rug pull, who do you think Rich Kid Jimmy will try to unload his now worthless shiney things on to? "Hey Dave, I know you were really interested in my Shiney Thing, And yeah its awesome and all, but I just brought another EVEN MORE SHINEY thing, As I know you, I'll let you have it for 50%". Rich Kid Jimmy will always be able to find new people to hover around him, burning a few won't matter too much to them, esp if they have that rich kid Jimmy mindset you seem to think they have.
Now all whats happened is 50% of your earnings have come from those you never intended to target, but inadvertently scammed anyway cause Rich Kid Jimmy wanted to recoup atleast some of their losses.
I Could write more and more about this, but I would be here all day and I have code to write/debug, so I will end it with this. At the end of the day you got to look at yourself and ask "can I sleep at night knowing what I'm doing will affect those who can't afford it?" Because even if you successfuly target Rich Kid Jimmy, their are always casualties of war that will get caught in the crossfire no matter how prefect of a plan you have.
If ther answer to that is YES, then hit me up, I have a bridge to sell.