A proposed Computational System design describes brain mechanisms and mind processes that explicitly and specifically impact the way we are - it is predictive and testable.
Initial reasoned observations appear to suggest consistency across phenomenological experience from volitional and circumstantial behaviours to often overlooked or dismissed idiosyncrasies (& points to explanation for a number of curious observations in scientific experiment).
Jolly good.
The problem is, I'm not in academia, and it's taking a while to write up. It has become much bigger than one person.
- Any tips/ thoughts on moving forwards?
- Positive
- Cautionary
- Concept validation?
- Connect with academia?
- Or relevant specialists?
- Independent release?
- Incremental?
- What would you want to know first?
- I'd prefer to remain anonymous initially as if it is shown to be formative it will upset some people
- Any thoughts on this?
- Would I be better asking somewhere else?
- If so where?
Many Thanks
I don't recommend going into academia. The system is unfortunately too broken right now.
You can reach many people by writing a good blog article, and posting it to interested communities like HN. Even anonymously, if you prefer.