After the whole night on tickets with vultr, their reply is "sorry suck it. we will give you 60 days credit". We pay them thousands per month for tons of customers. Not trying to bash them but more interested in asking HN if EC2 etc is more reliable ? This is not the first time we had issues with them recently (used to be great before). So I have decided that we are completely moving off Vultr.
We do use EC2 for some and DigitalOcean as well to mix it up. I am thinking that we should completely move to EC2 as I have found AWS Support to be the best.
Is this just the way it is with VPS companies or is EC2 more reliable ?
You can set up ongoing replication to another region so if there is a failure you don't actually lose anything. With AWS just be mindful of cost, they can get exorbitant pretty quickly.
Hardware fails regardless of VPS or physical server provider. Hard drives fail, raid controllers fail, raid arrays become corrupted on all providers EC2 and all other VPS providers equally. Data integrity is based on what backup strategy is in place. For highly critical data the application should be writing to n+1 locations, or a middle process such as ceph or gluster should handle that. The AWS version of this would be S3. What was your backup strategy aside from taking the offsite backups?