They use outside newswires to supplement, but the important part to me is that they are curating it.
The reasons I like them are:
1. There is no advertising. They are not trying to get you to click their headline to increase traffic.
2. There are no donations. No temptation to write for a 'left', 'right' or 'middle' audience.
3. They don't care about the US (where I live). They only report on US matters that are important. Crucial stores from my country are not mixed in with stories that are not meaningful or essential.
4. They are funded by the Ministry for Culture and Heritage.
5. And if the grid goes down, you can get them on shortwave, so they are dependable. (I discovered them on shortwave during an extended power outage)
They're very useful when the US/World news is overwhelming (i.e., Jan 6, etc).
British Broadcasting Corporation (United Kingdom) https://www.bbc.com/
Deutsche Welle (Germany) https://www.dw.com/en/top-stories/s-9097
The Times of India (India) https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/
The Hindu (India) https://www.thehindu.com/
Switzerland, and the German speaking world in general are almost always on the sidelines in issues of politics, tech, economics and especially foreign policy when it’s outside, or merely adjacent to continental Europe.
For issues in Europe, well, it’s Swiss & German speaking. In US affairs, of which there is slightly too much coverage, it manages to avoid the polemics present in German-German publications.
[0] https://www.euronews.com [1] https://www.politico.eu [2] https://www.rt.com
I judge on which US centric stories are covered and generally agree with other international sources. I find MSNBC, CNN, and Fox to be generally bad because of two reasons: they seem to be bad at walking back stories that they get wrong, and they seem to simply not cover some important topics.
I watch it on YouTube, it seems very balanced compared to American outrage porn
> Rest of World is an international nonprofit journalism organization. We document what happens when technology, culture and the human experience collide, in places that are typically overlooked and underestimated. We believe the story about technology is as big as the world that’s using it, and that everyone — from those building technology to those using it — can benefit from a broader global perspective.
For TV news I've started to stream DW (German) and France24 for europe in the background sometimes. Oddly they're in english. They're not supper hard hitting (I'm not sure if they're government sponsored or where they come from) but you get different stories and a different perspective and lately lots of spanish island volcano footage.
They have youtube streams.
1. DW News (German perspective)
2. BBC (British perspective)
3. Sky News (British perspective)
4. Al Jazeera English (Middle-eastern perspective)
5. WION (Indian perspective)
6. Dawn (Pakistani perspective)
7. The Print (Indian perspective)
My set of news websites is designed to give as wide a set of news sources as possible. So you will West-centric, China-centric, Russia-centric, Asian-centric websites in my list.
By having a very-wide set of sources, many of the biases (and ALL news sources are biased) will tend to cancel out. You will often find that news-sources omit stuff that isn't flattering to the local powers, so you won't see that news there, you will find it in one of the other sources instead.
The Guardian (Britain) https://theguardian.com/
Russia Today https://www.rt.com/
ABC News (Australia) https://www.abc.net.au/news/
Global Times (China) https://www.globaltimes.cn/
Press TV (Iran) https://www.presstv.ir/
BBC News (Britain) https://www.bbc.com/news/
Some websites I refuse to use are the Rupert Murdoch ones (Fox News, Wall Street Journal, Sky News, news.com.au, etc. from US, Britain, Australia.) These are generally unreliable and have been the focus of a court ruling which states "because they are classed as 'entertainment' and not 'news, they have no obligation to be truthful" - Florida ruling, early 1990s
RT.com
AlJazeera.com
France24.com
GBNews.uk
Skynews.com.au
https://www.australianbookreview.com.au/
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Canada
Czechia
https://www.project-syndicate.org/
France
https://www.connexionfrance.com/
https://www.mediapart.fr/en/english
Germany
https://www.theeuropean.de/en/
Greece
Hungary
India
https://www.hindustantimes.com/
Ireland
Israel
Japan
Lebanon
Luxembourg
Netherlands
Poland
Qatar
Romania
https://www.romania-insider.com/
https://www.riseproject.ro/investigation/
Russia
Spain
Turkey
UK
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/
https://www.dissentmagazine.org/
https://www.theguardian.com/world
https://www.bbc.com/news/world
https://www.independent.co.uk/
https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/
https://fortnightlyreview.co.uk/
https://www.kingsreview.co.uk/
https://www.philosophersmag.com/
https://publicdomainreview.org/
https://www.thewhitereview.org/
https://www.indexoncensorship.org/
--
Notes:
1. Some of these have editorial offices in multiple countries.
2. I'm UK based (to explain the bias above).
3. Lists tend to overload with information, but there are more.
and some foruns we cant name. like 4**