This thread says it all for me: https://twitter.com/RealNatashaChe/status/1444014735716851714
Disclosure: I have 99% of my net worth in cryptocurrencies since 2017. Even "cashing out" is hard since I can't find a sector or company which has better future growth expectations from these levels than the crypto space.
I basically bought real estate and left the rest in, even with the high volatility, since currently I cant seem to find a space which is more valuable than this.
The twitter thread you linked to is just a joke. First of all, it assumes that crypto will keep going up. Secondly, it talks about addressing inequality which it demonstrably doesn't. Inequality is the whole point especially if crypto is a good investment - getting in early is better than getting in late; buying is better than not buying - that's inequality. Crypto reorders wealth based on who bought the most at the earliest point in time.
It rubs me the wrong way when people use these moral justifications to defend crypto because it's plainly manipulative bullshit which is used to get in more suckers so that the prices can stay up.
Then there's people talking about the technology, or finance, or economics... most of those arguments for crypto aren't just wrong but very often the exact opposite is true.
Converting energy into non-productive work for financial speculation used substantially by money laundering activities is in the same category as:
Having Goldman Sachs invest my money in coal and diamond mines managed by cadres of Russian oligarchs.
So, is it a bubble now or not? I don't really know. Based on the previous pattern, if it is, in two years it could be worth 10% what I put in. Well, long term the trend is up. Those plateaus do peak again higher. Which brings me to the long-term risk problem. What if many countries move to ban or heavily regulate it -- before the next bubble? Or anything else. Technical, political, economic. Cryptocurrencies are a lot newer than gold or real estate or stocks. So many unknowns still.
So, for now, I see an opportunity for the lower (financial) classes to buy in, and make the kind of returns that they seldom see. A few more nouveau riche are no danger to the system.
But I suggest paying attention to the old adage: "invest no more than you are prepared to lose". Judicious realization of gains into a diversity of other assets will mean that when/if the music stops, you're left with something.
Personally, it doesn't pass for my ESG guidelines, and I'm prepared to forego the possible returns.
Besides that, cashing out wasn't very simple and triggered all sorts of warnings in my payment processor and bank.
That and it all feels like a house of cards. A house of cards everyone keeps trying to convince themselves is stable and strong.
An exhaustive discussion of my opinion is here:
https://www.rosshartshorn.net/stuffrossthinksabout/nyt_opini...
...along with some odd things about writing an opinion piece for the New York Times.
Then the exchanges would routinely shit the bed (or get wiped out completely) any time it was a good time to get out. Lookin' at you, YC funded startup Coinbase. And it continues to be that way.
My money is in real estate and I sleep better at night. Much better.