Any insights on HN on this problem?
This space is toxic but the underlying problem is the tension between individual privacy (DNC and off-directory numbers) and public-commons good.
That, and the truly bizarre decisions made regarding CLID in the payload and as presented by the apps: Why do we let people lie about sender-ID? This is like MANRS in BGP (Internet routing) -we shouldnt' allow injection of lies at origin.
Hard to police but high benefit (like BCP38/MANRS)
In HN lingo - where's the product/market fit? Who are the "customers" who'll pay to have this problem solved? How much will they pay, and how often? Will they recommend it to others in a viral growth mechanism?
Who's going to build a free non-spam version of that, how are they going to resource/monetise it?
I'd bet good money that what you want exists, but requires a subscription. How much would you personally pay for access to a non fucked version of this? (Or alternatively, can you imagine a market for the search data that you could sell on to pay for development/hosting/profit to run this? Maybe phone scammers would pay you for access to the list for numbers consumers are looking up?)
one thing i noticed more recently is the language used; before, you'd search "867-5309" and get the usual wording like "Looking for 867-5309?", now it's "WHAT THE HELL DID 867-5309 DO?!?!??!" or worse :D