My questions for Hacker News are:
1. Does the posting look realistic?
2. Does it describe someone who could get a community broadband network built?
3. How can the County get qualified people to apply?
I've been pushing on this issue since 2011. I went so far as serving on the County Board of Public Utilities and becoming its Chair in 2015. Finding that the Board had no authority over the issue, I turned to political organizing and set up the website blabnow.blog. On that site, you can see what I think we need a Broadband Manager to do at https://www.blabnow.blog/los-alamos-broadband-manager-positi...
Beyond asking for thoughts on the Broadband Manager position, I would like to read general comments on:
4. How to get local governments to take responsibility for modern communication utility monopolies?
1. Not realistic, but not outside of normal for an management infrastructure/ops position. What you are writing is what you hope for, but sometimes it sends a red flag to potential applicants. The worry many high level people have is that they will be turned into the 'do everything' person. Trim a few of the less directly related requirements off of the description (e.g. Microsoft certification).
2. Yes... but also No. There are a lot of people who push through their careers collecting credentials and turning it another rung on the ladder. Chances are you will get a rosy candidate at some point, who will put in two years of aggressively spending your budget to inflate their resume and then move on. Not that a majority of people are this way, but the filters are set in such a way that this is what you are likely to end up with.
3. Other comments will say 'pay more', but it will be difficult to meet market rates for this skillset when working with local governments. If you can't get approval to raise the comp, instead try to split this role up into a team. Governments won't pay one highly skilled person 250k, but they will pay four people 80k, and one manager 120k.
4. Politically? Find someone with pull, and make sure that it's 'their idea'. Something that they can put on their win list.
Procedurally? Don't boil the ocean. Handle it iteratively. Start with commercial areas and new housing developments. White-glove your initial smaller install and it will create the broad demand from the community to expand it.
Love what you are doing. Hope this helps.
The thing that would pop up as #1 for me is access to poles to run fiber. If this killed Google Fiber it can definitely kill a smaller upstart.
There are gatekeepers who limit this access and they work for the county, in the permit office. The incumbents have a relationship with these people, and if they don't you better believe that their folks will start building one as soon as your project is announced. All your local contractors currently supporting Comcast are also not on your side.
It is in these people's best interest to see your project die. To make things worse, they don't have to work very hard to make it happen. All they have to do is sit on a permit application long enough to cast doubt on the project. Whereas the broadband manager has a huge hill to climb in comparison: they would have to build a relationship with all the people blocking their progress or figure out how to sidestep them.
So the person you are looking for should have high-caliber government sales skills. Good luck finding someone like that who also has a masters degree in CS and will work for 140k. This person can make millions in commissions in enterprise IT sales and they know it.
This won't answer your immediate questions, but they've been heavily involved in getting startups to move to small communities. Municipal broadband is a big part of that, and I believe some of them worked on those efforts in Vermont.
https://madned.substack.com/p/thin-pipe-part-i
https://madned.substack.com/p/thin-pipe-part-ii
They probably have lots of contacts.
I think the long game that local politicians miss (or are financially motivated to not see) is that broadband is becoming as important to communities as roads. It facilitates lowering the costs of so many things, benefits companies+individuals+government, improves equality of access+opportunity, on and on.
Try talking with Allan and Mariela Saenz at Los Alamos Network, losalamosnetwork.com.
My blog is still there at fiberlanm.blogspot.com.
>> "Verizon 5G Home Internet, meanwhile, is a fixed wireless access service (FWA) powered by 5G Ultra Wideband that provides ultra-fast Wi-Fi connections to the home."
[1] https://www.verizon.com/5g/home/ [2] https://www.t-mobile.com/isp
Also, consider looking at https://godigitalmarin.org/ on what they've done.
https://pharrowtech.com/news/pharrowtech-telenet-and-unitron...
The trial is expected next year. Follow up on it and consider it later on. It could bring down the cost to a fraction and has an expected bandwith of 1Gbit/s per person.
https://www.whipcityfiber.com/
They got municipal fiber to their town and then started providing services to other towns in Massachusetts to do the same. All the tiny towns around my slightly larger town have gigabit fiber now for $79/month while I'm stuck at 25% of that for the same price from Comcast (my town is "fully serviced" by Comcast and thus not eligible).
Step 1) Hire somebody who has experience running a facilities based last mile gigabit class ftth isp. Sorry to say your job posting requirements and duties doesn't look anything like that right now.
Step 2) Have that person recruit the rest of the team
I’m just weary from trying to fight horrible broadband providers blocking every step of the way. Maybe the answer is to go over their heads.