Any suggestions and material to learn from?
2. Radical Candor is the book I learned the most from for the remaining 10%.
You can test this hypothesis by bringing up a mild controversial topic that won’t get anyone fired. State your opinion, and if you see the same pattern of everyone chiming in, voila, you now know it’s just a bunch of people that like talking to each other.
There are worse problems in life believe it or not.
This doesn't necessarily mean you do most of the work, but it does mean you decide when it is solved.
Decide what your values are, what you can accept and not accept. Be wary of things you can accept "this once" that will drive you up the wall if they happen repeatedly.
You should be able to tell people in this situation how you think this behavior affects you and the organization.
If you get a bad outcome in a situation repeatedly, prepare ahead of time!
In some situations I get flustered, inarticulate, and exhausted. If am not exhausted and flustered I can be articulate, so planning is a big help to me.
This works if you are the person in charge, the decision maker. If not it can be very frustrating for that individual. Is this you or as some others have suggested you are just among others who like to disagree?
If that’s true spirited disagreement is healthy. And part of life is any decision will not satisfy all parties. Even if someone shuts up, they’ll quietly grumble. It can be uncomfortable, and depends A TON on cultural context, but IMO i find conflict productive (so long as people aren’t mean).
If it’s NOT someone’s job to make a decision, well then disagreement is not the problem, it’s more an org design issue on who’s accountable..