Around 3 months ago, I started having issues with their "Export" feature. Basically, you request to export all your data on Notion, and you're supposed to receive a link to download it. But the link never arrives.
I contacted them about this, and that's what they said at the time:
> Our engineering team is currently working through a large backlog, and there is no immediate fix for this issue...
I explained this wasn't a "nice to have" feature. It was a critical function that locks us with them and goes against their selling message of "you own your data". I was ignored, with the same robotic tone.
So today, 3 months later, I contacted them again to say I'm having the same issue. They replied with the same message:
> Please accept my sincere apologies for the ongoing difficulties with this. Our engineering team is currently working through a large backlog, and there is no immediate fix for this issue. I’ve already alerted them to the issue and told them of your particular situation, and we’ll certainly follow up if there are any developments! Really appreciate your patience with us as we continue to improve. Please let me know if there’s anything else I can help with in the meantime.
I'm again explaining the same thing - If the feature isn't working, this is a critical function that they should at least try to generate manually as per my request.
They are basically locking me in. They, again, replied with scripted messages:
> Unfortunately, our engineering team is working through quite a backlog at the moment, and there isn't an immediate fix for this issue....
Any suggestions on what I can do? Thanks!
It's one thing to make a new feature request and have the response be "sorry, we'll get to it when we get to it." It's quite another to have a bug in an advertised, previously working feature, with no workaround, and say "sorry, our engineers have a big backlog."
Imagine if a bank said "sorry, we know the withdrawal feature to get your money is broken, but our engineers have a big backlog." Unbelievable!
https://www.notion.so/Back-up-your-data-1a8eb5bdfce34d19a636...
- *I tried clicking the `Export all workspace content` button but received an error message.*
Oof, so sorry about this For particularly large workspaces, the `Export all workspace content` function may have some trouble completing the export. We're investigating this issue and hope to have a resolution soon.
As a temporary workaround for this issue, you can export in smaller batches:
1. Navigate to a top-level page in your workspace
2. Click the `•••` button at the top right of the page, then click `Export` (you may not see this option if you're not an admin in the workspace)
3. Choose `Markdown & CSV` or `HTML` as the export format, and turn on the `Include subpages` toggle
4. Repeat for any other important top-level pages in the workspace that you'd like to have a backup of
Please note that we keep per-minute backups on our servers, and can help with data recovery at any time at team@makenotion.com. Thanks for your patience while we work on fixing this issue!
This is the part where you ask for them to generate the export on their end and send you a link manually.
It’s “normal” for a feature to stop working, but their support must be able to provide a workaround even if it takes them hours of manually zipping things. If they don’t, you should at the very least receive a refund.
I've been thinking a lot lately about ownership. If I have a book, I can interact with it the way the publisher expects (I can read it). But being a physical object, I can also do lots of other things with my book. I can burn it. I can give it to a friend. I can sell it. I can draw in it. I can rip it up and use it as wallpaper. I can get the author to sign the front cover and donate it.
Software used to work this way too. If I have a Word document, I can interact with it the way Word expects - open it, edit it, save it and so on. And I can also do things microsoft doesn't expect. I can put it on my website. I can email it. I can back it up. I can delete it. I can reverse engineer the file format and edit it using other programs. I can archive it for 30 years, and know it will still work when I open it using the version of microsoft Word which created it. And so on.
But the new software model with smartphone apps and data in the cloud takes all this away. You can only do with your data what the publisher expects. If Notion doesn't have a working export API, tough luck. If GMail is missing an API for searching by regular expression, tough luck. If Adobe shuts down their activation servers, or a startup fails, or Google kills a product, tough luck. You've lost all your data. There is no backdoor. There are no other ways, by default, for you to have any agency over your own data that a product manager hasn't approved of. Amazon can delete books that they've already sold you. And they have. You can't sell a game you bought on steam. Or get it signed by the author. Or reverse engineer the raw database entries which store a google doc.
And this sucks. Its disempowering. I love the security on my phone, and the operational simplicity of not needing to manage my own backups. But this? I hate this. I hate that there's a good chance Notion will aquihired by a big tech company and shut down. I'm not ok with my own creations being at the whim of market forces like this.
I reject the idea that word and google docs are the only options. Git + Github is the model I want, where the cloud is a convenience but everything is stored locally as well. We need to start fighting for that.
I can see how they would try to skirt around it though, they'd probably say that it is a temporary glitch but the functionality is available. That way it wouldn't be them withholding your data or false advertising per se, but rather a temporary incapacitation.
Another option would be to find other Notion customers who have the same issue or who can reproduce the same issue. That is, find other customers who you can ask to try to download their own data as well. If the issue is not isolated to you, then you can take class action against them and they would either have to take the feature down or issue a customer wide notice of of service/feature downtime. Either of these can be deemed a violation of the SLA on their part and give you a legal path for recourse.
In the mean time, you should probably reply to that email telling them to do it manually. Tell them that it is the feature you even got the subscription for. So if they said at the time of contract it is doable, then they ought to be able to do it manually if not via the feature.
Their backlog is none of your concern, they took your money and should deliver otherwise refund you.
Hope that helps.
This tells me their marketing dept is writing checks their product team can’t make good on. Not good.
I'm really, really sorry about this experience!
Our in-product export feature exports to a single file, and for very large workspaces this doesn't scale very well. (I know this is not an excuse for this experience. We'll do better and prioritize fixing this!)
Could you email me at ivan at makenotion.com? We'll work to fix this for you immediately.
Apologies, and really appreciate you for understanding!
Ivan
I interviewed with them years ago after sharing a lot of feedback and bug reports in their early years. I was PUMPED about this space and really wanted to help make something like Notion awesome. I wanted it to work for me, I wanted it to work for others, and I knew there would be tons to learn in the space. But my impression of Notion (not their devs specifically) left me feeling like it wouldn't happen there, and I just abandoned the process. This happened with Slite, too.
But it's stuff like this which lead me to believe I shouldn't work on those teams. As a dev, I probably can't fix that the company overwhelmingly doesn't care enough about making an important feature work.
I noticed a keen interest in my ideas about which features me or my team needed, or how existing features could expand to meet our needs, but not much interest in fixing bugs or limitations. Now we're here, and the export feature doesn't work while the company continues to move forward with other things.
I can't help but think this sort of outward appearance has a negative affect on how easily they can hire, and who they can hire. This sort of things is a nail in the coffin for me - I don't want to work somewhere where we deploy day after day after day knowing that things are effectively broken.
If you use any of the relational features in tables, they are exported only as URLs. There is no alternate export, and you can’t Copy&Paste the cells either.
Our CFO is unable to use this fancy relational table tool that we spent a lot of time and effort to build. Similar response from support.
First, I'd contact your state attorney general's office. See this link to usa.gov for a contact database: https://www.usa.gov/state-attorney-general || https://www.naag.org/find-my-ag/
Next, contact your representative in the House and both your Senators: https://www.house.gov/representatives && https://www.senate.gov/states/statesmap.htm
Then I'd reach out to the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) with a formal complaint: https://reportfraud.ftc.gov
Filing a complaint with the Better Business Bureau might prompt some movement, even though AFAIK they have no real power over anything, but reputation damage may be threat enough to get them to play ball: https://www.bbb.org/file-a-complaint
And for "the big one": reach out to journalists in the tech industry. Posting here at HN is a good first step, but I'd tell every tech journalist who's got ears (or eyes) what's going on and see how many of them pick it up. Hopefully enough to cause some real damage (because, sadly, they've made it clear that's what it'll take to get them to stop holding you hostage).
Finally, contacting an attorney for at least an initial consult can't hurt. See americanbar.org for a list of attorneys admitted to the bar for your state: https://www.americanbar.org/directories/bar-associations/
I don't envy you, and I'll very likely never use Notion now that I've heard about this. How can anyone trust them when they literally hold their own customers hostage, ally the while lying about why they're doing it?
Not great, but better than being stuck.
Was it ever working? “Having issues” seems to imply the functionality disappeared.
That being said, definitely not ideal and is always a risk when storing your data with a SaaS service (disclaimer: I'm the founder of dendron.so - a fast open source notion competitor made for developers)
Solution, if it's not built here, we don't rely on it. A lot more work up front, a lot more stable in the long run.
"there is no cloud just other people's computers"
Probably the letter will be cheaper but also risks them going "oh shit legal threat" and slamming your account closed meaning you no longer have access to your data at all not just no export.
Or, does this mean their backend development breaks their export code, so heavy rewrite the export code is required to make export work again?
I think you've actually made a good start by posting here on HN. As someone else wrote, going on other social media could also help. You could also file a complaint with the California Department of Consumer Affairs (whose contact info is helpfully provided in the terms). If you're a US resident you might also reach out to your local member of Congress. Many Congressional constituent services people can work wonders in cases like this.
Of course those are all the hammer. Another approach, if you've got the technical skills or willing to pay for them, is to look into writing something to leverage their API to extract your data -- although their terms prohibit spidering or scraping that's technically not the same as invoking an API. Depending on the real value of the data involved, it would probably be worth consulting a lawyer who does IP work _before_ you do any serious queries.
Did I mention that you should probably talk to a lawyer?
"We have a large backlog". How about you take it out of the backlog and work on fixing it or explain to me why it's complicated so I can empathize
Since their API is in public beta, I'm building a tool to back up and restore your Notion data to a storage provider of your choice:
She has now migrated all her personal notebooks to emacs orgmode and her company notebooks to gcloud/docs and MD files.
I ended up going with Notion because it was overall more user-friendly and handled image embeds easier, but Outline would be a nice option if you want to control your own data.
Notion grew massively with a targeted campaign "move from Evernote to Notion". Evernote's export feature works perfectly and you are free to go anytime. That's what honest SaaS companies do.
Notion seems to be a SaaS that wants to own your data. Their API was a promise for years until they had to give up. They wanted to be your walled "one stop shop": eyeballs and data 100% in their tool (like Google Workspace).
BTW, second rule of SaaS selection: choose a SaaS that do not make money selling your data to the big adtech players. Read the privacy policy!
I'm surprised you continued relying on them even after you realized this feature isn't working 3 months ago.
> I even exchanged emails with the founders giving detailed feedback
It also seems like you've been an early adopter so didn't you half expect this product might have major flaws and probably not the best idea to rely on it so heavily?
There seems to be an unofficial exporter you can use here: https://github.com/kjk/notionapi
Everything is saved as flat json files and image/data blobs.
Seeing this comment, is further solidifying the idea. Notion is a great editor, but having little control over data isn't great.
User should be able to control where the data lives. And when they want it gone, it should be gone. Poof!
A lot of gates open up once companies smell the power of the law, and anyone from their support likely _has to_ escalate any issue where a lawyer is plausibly mentioned.
You're already halfway there!
Minimal has fewer features than notion, but it is faster, more reliable, simpler, and more beautiful/delightful. And it is feature packed.
I love designing and building Minimal, and thousands of people love writing in Minimal.
0: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/refo...
If so many people on Hackernews do that, it would be like hitting them with a GDPR denial of service attack and they’ll be forced to push out this feature ASAP.
Anybody with your hand raised should be ashamed of yourself because I bet it's not true :)
Sure they should fix this -- but is this something they should be fined for? Or be DDOS-ed by Hacker News readers? Or GDPR reported for?
It's just not a great way to get help from up and coming businesses to force major financial pain on them and it's certainly not empathetic to what's likely a hard working, reasonable set of people on the other end of this service.