That made me realize that maybe the percentage of users who are biased in their judgement by working at FAANG is too high here.
Is there something similar to Hackernews which is less influenced by corporate interests?
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26912977
Probably wasn't downvoted because of some roaming downvote squad of FAANG-employed users. Lots of more straightforward reasons you can see here
The comment I write that get the most downvotes are comments where I honestly did not explain my position all that well and others misunderstand my comment.
In general try not to worry to much about up- or downvotes. They don’t really matter and can just as much reflect the current mood and situation of the person voting.
Still also try to reflect on your downvoted posts. Where you perhaps wrong? If not, use the opportunity to refine and clarify you position and arguments in the future. If you can’t formulate your critisism, then perhaps don’t comment until you can, if upvotes matter that much to you.
I have no ties to Google, I don't live in the US, I'll never work in a FAANG and in fact I dislike Google likely as much as you do.
I would stick with HN and live with the downvotes. It also helps to make any criticism polite.
Do you upvote or downvote based on agreement, or whether you thought the comment was worth reading, well said, important point, etc? Do you assume others are doing the same, and your vote counts reflect that?
I say votes dont matter; people hit those buttons for many reasons and we'll never know what those reasons were and shouldn't care.
If you felt it was worth saying, good. If you still do, better. If others disagree or not, here on HN; does it actually matter? Does it matter any more if they voted for grammar over content?
Guess a point has been made by that?