I'm wondering how common this is, sometimes I feel like just going through the process of writing but not posting, gives me enough satisfaction.
If this seems like a dumb question I'm sorry but am going to click "submit" this time anyways.
When it gets up that high I take it as a very good signal that I need to log off and step away until my mood improves enough for me to appear somewhat human.
Even with the ones that do make it through I will read and re-read what I have written to see if there are better ways to phrase things in a neutral tone before hitting submit. I also try to refrain from posting on HN when my blood alcohol level is above legal driving limits.
I don’t always succeed and sometimes a snarky or judgemental comment will slip through the internal safety net but I certainly try my best to avoid doing so.
Furthermore I usually only comment on ‘On Topic’ posts and eschew any ‘hot button’ comment threads since the down-votes tend to fly in the Reddit fashion rather than as per HN upvote/downvote guidelines on those.
Whenever Abraham Lincoln felt the urge to tell someone off, he would compose what he called a “hot letter.” He’d pile all of his anger into a note, “put it aside until his emotions cooled down,” Doris Kearns Goodwin once explained on NPR, “and then write: ‘Never sent. Never signed.’ - https://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/23/opinion/sunday/the-lost-a...
Eventually I started to type out comments, give them a read, and decide that either nothing would come of the conversation/argument, or worse, I would find myself in a flame war. I'd just delete the comment and move on.
It's been years since I've really written anything substantial online. Simply not worth it these days.
We all feel outrage and want to snark back. Writing a diss is cathartic. But experience shows they just provoke more in return, and the forum turns into a bunch of monkeys flinging poo at each other.
So, on behalf on HN, thanks for not submitting your snarks!
I just went through the process with this very comment since other people have said something similar and almost clicked off before deciding the irony was enough to go forward with posting it.
(Click on your username in the upper-right of the HN page, and then click on "comments.")
This might sound insincere, but I really try to write my comments so that they won't get downvoted.
> I ended up comming to the conclusion very little value, and deciding to not submit it.
Maybe every 3-4 months I decide not to submit a comment?
Honestly, I tend to abandon comments / posts on Facebook more than I do here. Hacker News tends to be a lot more civil, with good enough moderation that flamewars get doused quickly. Thus, I don't feel the need to even start the kind of post that I will abandon.
I also find that sometimes I'll write a well written and reasoned comment, but it may go against the typical group think. So I'll not post that as well. It seems all too often people use the arrows to indicate agreement or disagree instead of well written vs poorly written and the comments to debate the merits.
Such is the nature of things.
The intellectual superiority bullshit flying around this site all the time is usually it. And I love having this community to participate in, don’t get me wrong, but you have to admit it’s ridiculous sometimes.
In these cases I don’t feel smart enough, well traveled enough, like my voice matters, the whole nine yards. I’ve worked with people who do this too. It sucks to know someone just doesn’t trust you to know what you’re doing.
I dunno, there are tons of feelings behind that closing of the tab instead of submitting the comment haha
You don't mention 1. votes and 2. dang's reprimand.. Q. Would people submit 100% of comments if not for these motivating factors?
Sometimes I respond without going through the discussion so I remove my replies if I see it being repeated elsewhere in the comments.
I am trying to be more empathetic and helpful. Adding snarky comments would be opposite of that so I don't do it.