Is the concern simply, "we don't know how this could change the computing landscape," or is something more like "quantum computing promises to calculate primes in O(1) time, rendering keypairs worthless"?
And how far out are we realistically?
Some address types are already quantum-resistant. Of course the addresses that are just public keys (not hashed public keys) are vulnerable.
From https://www2.deloitte.com/nl/nl/pages/innovatie/artikelen/qu...
ECDSA wallet signatures can easily be broken with a sufficiently sized QC and now are essentially a billion dollar bounty on whether a country or corp has gotten there.
Switching over to post-quantum signatures is a simple matter but the coins will have to be moved to secure them.
So, someone with access to such a computer can learn the private key for any wallet on the planet and steal the contents, but they can't magically mine with 100% hashpower or undo history and all prior tx's.
Quantum resistance blockchain architecture is in the works or even available in theory and if the danger is real Bitcoin can be forked/modified to be quantum resistant. Because community would most probably be okay with this switch it would be accepted world wide.