For macOS, the support revolves around Xcode. Cross-compilation support is Apple-specific and won't benefit Linux. CPU architecture is abstracted away in macOS as much as possible, so average developers won't think much about ARM support.
Where Apple wants developers to tune for M1 specifically, is their proprietary frameworks for ML acceleration and Metal, which don't benefit anyone but Apple.
At best there may be some halo effect from proving that ARM can be as fast as "real" desktop CPUs, and it's not just the low-end slow Qualcomm chips. That might legitimize running ARM on servers, but Pi is neither high-end desktop nor a server platform.
It'd be awesome if Apple would let Raspberry Pi use their M1 chips, but clearly that's never going to happen!
Will Apples move to Intel mean better support for the PC?
Answer: No.
But they do support clang.
Where I think it's a game-changer is in Docker images. A lot of projects only build x86_64 images, M1 means they'll build ARM images as well
Virtualization tools and host OSes will probably see a huge boost in ARM support as well, but the Raspberry Pi is a bit too limited to really take advantage of these improvements.
A side-effect of the above is that the projects will also support other ARM-based chipsets, such as Raspberry Pi's
It's just another example of why non-portable code is silly.
So - before M1 announce ARM market was reserved for battery devices when huge limitation is power for them. Performance was important, but most important is power consumption.
There was also some niche server-side ARM like Marvell ThunderX, Qualcomm Centriq or Amazon Graviton.
Actually Apple acquire P.A. Semi company in 2008 and before that they're known for PWRficient processors.
Now M1 release shock whole industry.
First PC manufacturers like Dell or HP - but for now they're tied with vendors as Intel and Microsoft. Second Cloud operators like Digital Ocean and Google - only Amazon have their own ARM CPU. Third OS vendors like Microsoft - they're having a Windows RT in past and need to revive it ASAP. Forth are CPU vendors like Intel, AMD that providing x86 and Broadcom, Qualcomm that are ARM - because first can seen how their x86 product line is outperform from ARM products. And other can seen how even their top ARM products are outperform from niche player as Apple.
In result - expect shortly a HUGE investments in post-x86 for different chips architectures and as result RPi will be improvement. But not today!
PS: Do you remember Russian CPU Elbrus? It's VLIW! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PUNJ_tkq2hk