https://www-newsweek-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.newsweek...
Language design, in fact the existence of language as we are discussing, is the exclusive domain of humans. It takes humans to invent a new language (See mine: [0]) because only humans can make the leap to something truly new. Computers won't invent programming languages any more than they can paint real paintings or make real music. Computer speech, writing, art, and music can only be made from parts which were curated or defined by people.
This is so purely subjective it makes my head spin. What makes a programming language _better_ than any other? Surely the right tool for the job, and the tool that you have the most knowledge and experience in, is the 'best' programming language.
It just strikes of that 'beginner-programmer' thinking where we latch onto language_x and then proselytise it for no other reason than we are proficient in it, without any self-awareness of our own opinions.
If AIs are writing code directly, they might work faster with a very different-looking language that would be hard for people to design. So they might evolve something for their own use.
You'll just have a conversation. Maybe if your trained in one of those "old programming languages" you might exchange pseudo code to get your point across. or draw out a truth table.