Somewhat paradoxically, the more successful we are at flattening the curve, the longer we will need to be in a state of shutdown. The estimates I've been hearing from experts is that 20-60% of Americans will eventually get infected. And that if we're successful in "flattening the curve", it will take 12-18 months before the virus plateaus off. Which is roughly when a vaccine will be ready for mass-use as well.
Assuming that the current shutdown measures are successful and we flatten the curve over a 12-18 month period, what exactly is our end game here? Are we going to sustain our current lockdowns for the entire upcoming year?
As a tech worker who is happily working from home, I don't mind at all. But what about all the people working retail, dining, entertainment, tourism, and similar industries? Are we willing to accept putting them out of work for an entire year? The shutdown has barely been in place for 2 weeks, and people are already suffering under the financial burden. The $1000 payout being considered will certainly help... but only temporarily. Can we really handle extending the status quo for an entire year?
Once the epidemic is under control they can be lifted, but precautions and strict procedures must remain, which depend on the people being diligent and with a strong civic sense.
See China, Korea, etc.