When I reflect on the various technical books I've read over my life, I realize that the ones that I am able to get through most easily and pick up the ideas within with the least amount of friction are those written in a more colloquial manner. In fact, I often find pieces of writing that are devoid of any kind of 'voice' impenetrable, especially if their subject matter in nontrivial.
However, through all my years from childhood through college nearly every single teacher/professor I've had has wagged a finger saying "do not write like you speak" at some point. This seems to be the norm, as my younger sibling just told me about similar experiences.
I fail to see the value in intentionally writing in a way that is completely different from how you speak.
Does anyone here have opposite experiences, do more colloquial styles make things too obscure or hard/annoying to follow?
---
[1] http://www.paulgraham.com/talk.html
Paul Graham mentions taking physically awkward bits and making them sound conversational. That is the trick. Don't start with stream of consciousness and call it conversational. Start with normal writing and make it flow like a conversation.
Writing conversationally is a bit like writing dialogue. The trick it to taken written word and make it sound natural. Unfortunately it's a very unnatural act to do this well, and you will notice they do differ in subtle ways. For example, no one says goodbye or asks for change in dialogue.